[Update:] For people arguing about when the strains of HIV were discovered by modern science, take note that there were strains from which the HIV derived that have existed well before the 20th century, in fact the original strain dates back more than 60 million years, as reported by Stat News. More accurately, the exact date for the origins of the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus is not entirely known, nor in how many species it may have been present in or could have infected over the years before microbiology and epidemiology became exacting sciences, as detailed in a study on the Journal of Virology. However, to reduce the autism surrounding this topic, and to focus more on the absurdity of gay Vikings, the passage has been updated and clarified in the first paragraph.
[Original article:] Ubisoft made it known that Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla was going to have plenty of gay Vikings, even though there was no medicine for STDs back then and no treatment for viruses of a sexual nature, thus making gay sex a dangerous and oftentimes life-threatening choice for homosexuals. Well, a new video clip has followed through with proving that Ubisoft wasn’t lying about adding a bunch of gay Vikings to Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla.
The video clip comes courtesy of YouTuber Shirrako, who does the world a great service in warning gamers beforehand as to what sort of LGBTQIA+ propaganda would be present in the upcoming open-world RPG.
Obviously, viewer discretion is advised since the clip shows aberrant acts of a degenerate nature.
Thankfully, normal people realize that this sort of thing is disgusting and rightfully downvoted the video to make it known that they are not okay with gay Vikings.
Now keep in mind that this isn’t a downvote against Shirrako, it’s a downvote against the Liberal Progressive propaganda being shoved down our throats in every single AAA game out there.
In this case, it doesn’t even make sense why it’s there where it is.
Things start off tame enough when Eivor and Broder are bantering about who can best one another in a drinking game, which then leads into a segment where gamers have to out-drink the gay Viking in a rather trite mini-game.
Afterward, Broder slithers back into the company of Eivor and begins to beseech him for his company using salacious euphemisms, as if his tongue were a sex-starved snake.
This leads Eivor into several dialogue options where he can either deny the advances of his female-averse comrade, or indulge them.
Before initiating the actual sex, Eivor has the option to literally outright ask if Broder means to penetrate him, and Broder openly answers “Yes”.
This then leads the player into either consenting to the lecherous nature of the moral outcast or deny the heathen his lustful thrusts.
If you give in to the temptation of sin then a short cinematic will play, involving Eivor and Broder.
The two walk down by the sunset-lit quay, embracing briefly before Eivor takes charge and leans in with a kiss to Broder’s lips.
The camera cuts over Broder’s shoulders as Eivor continues his purge masculinity in favor of immorality, pushing Broder back against the stone newel while closing the distance with carnal intent.
We then both hear and see Eivor ripping at Broder’s clothes, seeking to disrobe his fellow Viking to lay into him like a stiff rod into a shallow fishing pond.
Broder makes exclamations as to the outcome of their sexual encounter, confirming that what was on the table had little to do with oral fixations.
After hearing some rustling of clothes and movements of bodies, the scene fades back in after the dastardly deed involving the duty-holes of the two dandies conclude.
It’s a lazily done scene but there to win brownie points with people who don’t play games but spend all their time online complaining about “representation” and “acceptance”, two things that they neither earned nor deserve.
The time wasted on making pointless propaganda for only a single-digit percentage of hedonists makes the whole affair tawdry in the worst ways possible. This is given that the animation team could have been spending more time refining the awful combat animations, or improving the overall procedural facial interaction sequences. Instead, they were wasting time making gay sex scenes all while including none of the truisms attached to the lifestyle choice.
For instance, did you know:
- Gays and lesbians are only 1.6% of the population but gays account for 67% of all HIV cases.
- Gays have high rates of substance and drug abuse.
- Lesbians have high rates of alcohol and tobacco abuse.
- Lesbians have double the rates of domestic abuse.
- Lesbians have higher rates of heart attacks.
- Lesbians and bisexual women have higher rates of obesity.
- Lesbians and bisexual women have higher rates of breast cancer.
- Gays statistically have far more sexual partners than heterosexuals.
- Gays have higher than normal STD rates.
- Gays have higher than normal suicide rates.
Of course not. Why would Ubisoft want you to be informed about the truth of the matter? That’s not to mention that being a gay Viking was not an honorable nor preferable lifestyle choice among the Nords. Will Ubisoft note that according to most historical findings, the men were expected to wed and have kids and the women were expected to birth children and maintain the home? Probably not, since their whole goal is to propagate anti-hetero sentiments.
Expect majority of the romances in Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla to be of the homosexual variety, and also expect no mention of sound family values to raise a family with a man and woman as a husband and wife. In fact, I wouldn’t doubt it if we see a bunch of interracial pairings, lesbian pairings, and homosexual marriages sprinkled throughout the game, since the whole goal is to deconstruct Western values by brainwashing gamers into thinking that degenerate lifestyles are a-okay and completely normal.
Newsflash: they’re not.
(Thanks for the news tip 4KQLE/2K IPS/SWITCH RACE)